Legal Opinion

Davies v. Keiser

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 30, 1922PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This action was for the purpose of partitioning certain real estate in the city of St. Louis, and to secure an accounting for the rents and profits arising therefrom. There was a trial before the court, resulting in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals.

In the fall of 1906 P. F. Vander Lippe was in the real estate and loan business in the city of St. Louis. John Davies was an architect and a builder. E. H, Keiser, the defendant herein, had for many years prior and subsequent to 1906 been building houses, selling them and investing in real estate mortgag.es, stocks and other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seymour v. FreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Holloway v. HollowaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Dameron v. JamesonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. Hudson v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Marsala v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Swon v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Jones v. McGonigleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Adams v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Cullen v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Cunningham v. KinnerkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API