Legal Opinion

Randal J. Chatham v. Colonel Blake Adcock

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 24, 2009No. 07-14995UnpublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Randal Chatham, a pro se prisoner, filed a complaint against three prison officials of the Coweta County Jail complaining that the officials showed deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition by denying him access to medication and failing to protect him from prisoner violence, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. See U.S. Const., amend. VIII, XIV. The prison officials denied Chatham’s allegations and, as an affirmative defense, alleged that they were immune from suit under the doctrine of qualified immunity. Following an initial round of discovery, the officials…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Dean Effarage Farrow v. Dr. WestCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Dunn (INMATE 2)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022
  2. Baker v. ShellyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  3. Baker v. ShellyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  4. Brenizer v. County of Sherburne, TheDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
  5. Byner v. Dunn (INMATE 2)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API