Olson v. Job Service North Dakota
North Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceCrothers, Justice
[¶ 31] I concur in the result reached by the majority. I respectfully submit the *47discussion by the majority and the dissent have gone farther afield than necessary to decide this case.
[¶ 32] We are directed by law to interpret words in a statute according to their ordinary sense. N.D.C.C. § 1-02-02. “When the wording of a statute is clear and free of all ambiguity, the letter of it is not to be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit.” N.D.C.C. § 1-02-05. The statute at issue here provides in pertinent part:
“An individual is disqualified for benefits:
[[Image here]]
“For any week…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alexander v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Mead Products v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983