Legal Opinion

Perry v. Fletcher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1933No. 22174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A person who is non compos mentis, feeble-minded, and incapable of handling his properly, or of understanding or completing the simplest business transaction, although he may not have been legally-*451adjudged a lunatic or a person non compos mentis, is incapable of binding his estate by any contract entered into by him, and is incapable of accepting service or defending a lawsuit instituted against him; and where such a person was sued upon what purported to be a contractual obligation entered into by him, and was served only by the leaving of a copy of the petition and process at his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Compress Co. v. Leffler & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Schulze v. SchulzeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Dixon, Mitchell & Co. v. Baxter & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Doe ex. dem. Foster v. RoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  5. Watkins v. StulbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. FletcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Dupree v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Chambers v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Berkeley v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API