McFarlane v. Roberta
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 21) AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 29)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pro se plaintiffs Crystal McFarlane and her minor children, S.M., J.M., and N.H. (together “Ms. McFarlane”) bring this action against the State of Connecticut Department of Children and Families (“DCF”) and DCF social workers Jan Roberta and Karen Balzener (the “Social Workers”) for a variety of federal and state claims chiefly arising out of the events leading up to and including the removal of Ms. McFarlane’s children…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rasheen v. AdnerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Johnson v. ChampionsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2014
- Callahan v. New HavenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Monroe v. New Neighborhoods, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Ramsey v. RamseyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023