Legal Opinion

Wiman v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 2004No. 03-844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Kay Wiman (Wiman) appeals the judgment of the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Fallon County, affirming the decision of the Montana Department of Labor and Industry, Board of Labor Appeals (the BOLA).

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal and affirm:

¶3 1. Did the District Court, the BOLA, and the hearing officer err in not resolving the inconsistent positions taken by Fallon County in disciplining Wiman?

¶4 2. Did Wiman adequately preserve her argument regarding exclusion of evidence for her present appeal?

¶5 3. Did the hearing officer correctly determine that the evidence was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Potter v. Montana Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Potter v. DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUST.Montana Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montana Department of Corrections v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Pesek v. Defense Commissary AgencyMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API