Casey v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtKashtwa, Judge
This is an action by taxpayers, husband and wife, who were members of a joint venture engaged in certain phases of the lumbering business, for a refund of federal income taxes paid for the calendar years 1960 and 1961. The sole question involved is whether the plaintiffs’ proportionate shares of the amortized cost of access logging roads are (1) as plaintiffs contend, deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under § 162 of the Internal Revenue *234Code of 1954,1 or (2) as the Government contends, capital in nature constituting part of the adjusted depletion basis (cost) of tbe…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Towanda Textiles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Union Bag-Camp Paper Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. Dorothy C. ReganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Ransburg v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Coors v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Coors v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
- Southern Pacific Transp. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980