Towell v. Etter
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Crittenden Circuit Court. Felix G-. Tayloe, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. . The appellee, Etter, brought this action of forcible entry and detainer against appellant Towell, who claimed to be a tenant of appellant Thompson, to recover possession of 35 acres of land, said to be accretion to southwest quarter of section 13, township 9 south, range 8 east, and claimed damages in the sum of $50. Thompson, being the real party in interest, was made defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Crittenden Circuit Court. Felix G-. Tayloe, Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. . The appellee, Etter, brought this action of forcible entry and detainer against appellant Towell, who claimed to be a tenant of appellant Thompson, to recover possession of 35 acres of land, said to be accretion to southwest quarter of section 13, township 9 south, range 8 east, and claimed damages in the sum of $50. Thompson, being the real party in interest, was made defendant. The evidence shows that Etter bought the land in controversy March 13, 1889, and had a house upon it, and had, through his…
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
Opinion delivered May 18, 1901.
Hughes, J.
The facts in this case, as stated when the opinion was delivered which we are asked to reconsider, are as follows:
“The appellee, Etter, brought this suit of forcible entry and detainer against appellant Towell, to recover possession of 35 acres of land, said to be accretion to southwest quarter of section 13, .township 9 south, range 8 east, and claimed damages in the sum of $50. Thompson, being the real party in interest, was made defendant. The evidence shows that Etter bought the land in controversy March 13, 1889, and had a house upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Anderson v. MillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
- Hall v. TrucksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881