Legal Opinion

Meeks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 27, 1972No. A-17622Published

1DissentBrett, Judge

I must respectfully dissent to this decision because as I view the facts, the State failed to prove the essential elements of second degree burglary in this case. 21 O.S.1971, § 1435, provides:

“Every person who breaks and enters any building or any part of any building, room, booth, tent, railroad car, automobile, truck, trailer, vessel or other structure or erection, in which any property is kept, or breaks into or forcibly opens, any coin operated or vending machine or device with intent to steal any property therein or to commit any felony, is guilty of burglary in the second degree.”

This…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Sies v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Starr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API