Baumert v. Malkin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Manfred Malkin and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 3d day of July, 1919, overruling the demurrers to the complaint, with leave to defendants to withdraw the demurrers and to serve answers.
1Opinion of the Court
Dowling, J.:
The complaint herein sets forth that on May 2, 1887, Walter F. Kilpatrick was the owner in fee of the block bounded by One Hundred and Twenty-first street and One Hundred and Twenty-second street, Sixth (now Lenox) and Mount Morris avenues, in the city of New York, and being about to convey the street lots in said block to William A. Martin, Anthony Smyth, Samuel O. Wright and Frederick Aldhous, *859an undivided one-half interest in the avenue lots to Henry Morgenthau, said Kilpatrick and Morgenthau as parties of the first part, entered into an agreement with Martin, Smyth, Wright and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Booth v. . KnipeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Barnett v. Vaughan InstituteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Barnett v. . Vaughan InstituteNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Kurtz v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Kurtz v. PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baumert v. MalkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Bryan v. DarlingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947