Legal Opinion

Samatula v. Piechota

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 5, 1948No. Docket 147/146PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant Samatula is the owner of a tract of land on Locust Avenue, in the Borough of Wallington. The plot is slightly irregular but, for the purposes of this discussion, may be regarded as being 75 feet wide by 100 feet in depth. On the southwesterly side of the property there is a building which occupies 24 feet of the width of the lot; the balance of 51 feet is vacant. This building has a store in front and living quarters in the rear which are occupied by the complainant. There is no inside passage between the living rooms and the store. To reach the street, complainant must leave…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Downs v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Zuckerman v. GellerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ocean Cape Hotel Corp. v. Masefield Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. California Natural, Inc. v. Nestle Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. Notch View Associates v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Capano v. Borough of Stone HarborDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
  5. Mallon v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API