Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Stanford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 2006No. 4D06-96PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

940 So.2d 605 (2006)

Joseph STANFORD, Appellant,

v.

Miriam STANFORD, Appellee.

No. 4D06-96.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 1, 2006.

Richard G. Bartmon of the Law Offices of Bartmon & Bartmon, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Jan Peter Weiss, Lake Worth, for appellee.

FARMER, J.

In a pretrial order allowing husband's lawyer to withdraw, the court gave husband 60 days to obtain new counsel. Exactly 28 days after that order, and within the 60-day period allowed for the appearance of new counsel, the trial judge inexplicably proceeded to try the case in the absence of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eubanks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eubanks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Bonilla v. Bank UnitedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API