Nationwide Insurance Co. v. Parmer
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Plaintiffs, Nationwide Insurance Company (Nationwide), as subrogee of Edward and Anne Mickel, and Edward and Anne Mickel individually (collectively, Appellants), appeal the trial court’s Orders granting Appellees-Defendants’, Paul Parmer, II (Parmer) and Heather Sida (Sida) (collectively, Appellees), motions for leave to amend their affirmative defenses and the trial court’s Order denying Appellants’ motion to reconsider. 1
We affirm.
ISSUES
Appellants raise one issue on appeal, which we restate as: Whether the trial court abused its discretion…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowles v. TatomIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Hendrickson v. Alcoa Fuels, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Osterloo v. Wallar Ex Rel. WallarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bloemker v. Detroit Diesel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
- North Willow Operating LLC v. ClayIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc. v. Acadia Merrillville Realty, L.P. and Boyd Construction Company, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc. v. Acadia Merrillville Realty, L.P. and Boyd Construction Company, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc. v. Acadia Merrillville Realty, L.P. and Boyd Construction Company, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013