Legal Opinion

Nationwide Insurance Co. v. Parmer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 2011No. 41A01-1008-CT-377PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Plaintiffs, Nationwide Insurance Company (Nationwide), as subrogee of Edward and Anne Mickel, and Edward and Anne Mickel individually (collectively, Appellants), appeal the trial court’s Orders granting Appellees-Defendants’, Paul Parmer, II (Parmer) and Heather Sida (Sida) (collectively, Appellees), motions for leave to amend their affirmative defenses and the trial court’s Order denying Appellants’ motion to reconsider. 1

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellants raise one issue on appeal, which we restate as: Whether the trial court abused its discretion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bowles v. TatomIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hendrickson v. Alcoa Fuels, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Osterloo v. Wallar Ex Rel. WallarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Bloemker v. Detroit Diesel Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. North Willow Operating LLC v. ClayIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc. v. Acadia Merrillville Realty, L.P. and Boyd Construction Company, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc. v. Acadia Merrillville Realty, L.P. and Boyd Construction Company, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc. v. Acadia Merrillville Realty, L.P. and Boyd Construction Company, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API