Legal Opinion

Shields v. Brundige

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1832PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT.

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, delivered by

Mathews, J.

The plaintiff, as holder of certain promissory notes made payable to one E. T. Hale, and by him endorsed in blank, sues by attachment to recover the amount of these notes from the maker.

The counsel appointed to defend the absent debtor pleaded in defence the prescriptions of five and ten years. This plea was sustained by the court below, and judgement accordingly rendered, from which the plaintiff appealed.

The most important question presented in this case for decision, arises out of the circumstance of the payment of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adle v. PrudhommeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1861
  2. State Ex Rel. Landry v. BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. LeBeau v. GlazeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
  4. Theriot v. Heirs of DugasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Aldridge v. ReedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API