Legal Opinion
Flores v. Woodspecialties, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1956No. Civ. 21193PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE (Paul), J. pro tem. *
This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the amount of a check drawn by the defendant in which the El Paso National Bank was named as payee, and of which plaintiff claimed to be a holder in due course.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
The parties to the transactions involved here, other than the plaintiff and the defendant, are the El Paso National Bank (hereinafter called “The Bank”) and a Mexican corporation Exportadora Ponderosa, S.A. (hereinafter called ‘ ‘ Exportadora ”).
Responsive to issues tendered by the third amended…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liberty Trust Co. v. TiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- First National Bank v. Pomona Tile Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Johnson v. UlreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hockett v. Pacific States Auxiliary Corp.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Atlantic City National Bank v. Commercial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Security First Nat. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Burke v. Mission Bay Yacht SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Christensen v. Financial Service Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1963
- Hallowell v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Plitt v. KellamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.