Legal Opinion

Ryland v. R. P. Const. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1944No. 6751PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit under the Workmen's Compensation Act of this State, No. 20 of 1914, as amended. There is no dispute over the facts and the lower Court has stated them as follows:

"Defendant owned and operated power machinery, motor vehicles, gasoline motors and other machinery to excavate ditches or trenches in which to lay sewer pipes and to refill the same. This work was being carried on, at the time of the accident on February 11, 1943, in the residence portion of the Town of Pineville, from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. approximately.
"Plaintiff was employed as a night watchman and began his duties at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dewey v. Lutcher-Moore Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Rayburn v. De MossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Gray v. Tremont Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Horton v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guidry v. SerignySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Viator v. New Hotel Monteleone, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Satterwhite v. Zurich Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Hull v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Coleman v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API