Legal Opinion
Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc. v. Committee of Receivers
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 14, 1993No. 84 Civ. 2602(CBM) and 90 Civ. 2140(CBM)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants The Emirate of Dubai (“Dubai”) and The Committee of Receivers for A.W. Galadari, et al (“the Committee”) separately move to dismiss the amended and supplemental complaints of the plaintiffs The Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc. (“Drexel”) and Refco, Inc. (“Refco”). Both motions, of Dubai and of the Committee, are denied.
Plaintiffs Drexel and Refco move jointly for security against Dubai and the Committee for costs, judgment, and potential sanction. Drexel’s motion, as to costs not including attorneys fees, is granted. Refco’s…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- First American Corp. v. Al-NahyanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc. v. Committee of Receivers for A.W. GaladariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Selletti v. CareyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Y2K Shipping & Trading Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc. v. Committee Of Receivers For A.W. GaladariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.