Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Ostreicher
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 31, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*799In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Carson, J.), dated October 15, 2004, which denied her motion for leave to enter a judgment against the defendants upon their failure to appear or answer, and for an inquest on the issue of damages, and granted the defendants’ cross motion to compel her to accept their verified answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Proof that service upon the defendant David Ostreicher (hereinafter Ostreicher) was made by delivery of the summons and complaint to a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bunch v. Dollar Budget, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Trimble v. SAS Taxi Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Goodman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jolkovsky v. LegemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Gainey v. AnorzejAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hosten v. OladapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Perez v. Travco InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Crimmins v. Sagona Landscaping, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.