Legal Opinion
Yolanda Wade v. Automation Personnel Services
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 11, 2015No. 14-5890UnpublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
Yolanda Wade worked as one of three employees in the Chattanooga office of Automation Personnel Services, an all-female office. After months of allegedly inappropriate behavior by her supervisor, Tammy Gross, Wade brought various Title VII and Tennessee Human Rights Act claims against Gross and Automation, alleging a hostile work environment caused by sexual, racial, and religious harassment. She also brought state-law claims for retaliatory discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted summary judgment for Automation and…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Phillips v. UAW InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Jeffry Smith v. Rock-Tenn Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Michael Threat v. City of Cleveland, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Garrett v. Mercedes-Benz Fin. Servs. USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Kea v. DonahoeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.