Wolf v. Chandler
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Freemont Circuit Court. The plaintiff alleges that she is the owner of certain lots in the city of Hamburg, and that the defendant Samuel Chandler, as sheriff, has levied upon them as the property of J. J. Wolf, under an execution in favor of Kate E. Buckham against J. J. Wolf. The plaintiff prays that Chandler be restrained from selling the property and that the judgment of Kate E. Buckham be decreed no lien thereon.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Freemont Circuit Court. The plaintiff alleges that she is the owner of certain lots in the city of Hamburg, and that the defendant Samuel Chandler, as sheriff, has levied upon them as the property of J. J. Wolf, under an execution in favor of Kate E. Buckham against J. J. Wolf. The plaintiff prays that Chandler be restrained from selling the property and that the judgment of Kate E. Buckham be decreed no lien thereon. The defendants allege that the property in question was purchased by J. J. Wolf, but with fraudulent intent of avoiding any judgment which might be entered against…
1Opinion of the Court
Day, J”.
1. FRAUDULENT conveyance: evidence: burden of proof. The lots in controversy were purchased and deeded to the plaintiff in August 1878. Kate E. Buckham recovered a judgment for $3000, against J. J. Wolf, for selling intoxicating liquors to her husband, causing his death. The abstract does not show the date of tíre judgment, nor of the commencement of the action, but it does show that the action was commenced subsequently to May 29th, 1879, and hence, at the least, nine months after the conveyance to plaintiff. The evidence does not show when the cause of action in favor of Kate E.…
2Cited by5 opinions
- First National Bank v. CurrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Eisfield & Co. v. DillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Allen v. WegsteinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Donovan v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Platt v. SchreyerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885