Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kinnison v. Kinnison

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1981No. 5445Published

1DissentRooney, Justice

I cannot agree to uphold the validity of any contract which is contrary to law, morality and public policy. That such should not be upheld has always been established law. Campbell v. Prater, 64 Wyo. 293, 191 P.2d 160 (1948); Takahashi v. Pepper Tank & Contracting Co., 58 Wyo. 330, 131 P.2d 339 (1942); Lingle v. Snyder, 160 F. 627 (8th Cir. 1908); Tanno v. Eby, 78 Ohio App. 21, 68 N.E.2d 813 (1946); Spurgeon v. McElvain, 6 Ohio 442 (1834); Rock v. Ekern, 162 Wis. 291, 156 N.W. 197 (1916); Goodrich v. Tenney, 144 Ill. 422, 33 N.E. 44 (1893).

At the outset, I emphasize that I do not find…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Guldberg v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. United States v. Samuel Neidorf and Maria Glickman, of the Estate of Mannes n.glickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Bill v. GattavaraWashington Supreme Court · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API