MW Clearing & Grading, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1DissentJackson, Judge
For the reasons stated below, I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Petitioner’s violations constituted nine, rather than one, violations of North Carolina General Statutes section 143-215.114A.
I concur, however, with the majority’s conclusion that Petitioner violated 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2D. 1900 and reluc*183tantly agree that the agency’s use of the measuring wheel was acceptable, although I would caution regulatory agencies against the dangers of using another’s equipment as the basis for their enforcement actions as became apparent in the instant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.