Legal Opinion · Dissent

MW Clearing & Grading, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 2005No. COA04-852Published

1DissentJackson, Judge

For the reasons stated below, I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Petitioner’s violations constituted nine, rather than one, violations of North Carolina General Statutes section 143-215.114A.

I concur, however, with the majority’s conclusion that Petitioner violated 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 2D. 1900 and reluc*183tantly agree that the agency’s use of the measuring wheel was acceptable, although I would caution regulatory agencies against the dangers of using another’s equipment as the basis for their enforcement actions as became apparent in the instant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API