Legal Opinion
Republic Industries, Inc. ex rel. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc. v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 27, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 82-0146PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
We recently observed that a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 62(c) presents a “difficult inquiry” for the trial judge who has already reached the legal merits of the controversy and rendered a conclusion unfavorable to the moving party. Kawecki Berylco Industries, Inc. v. Fansteel, Inc., 517 F.Supp. 539, 541 (E.D.Pa.1981). To prevail on a Rule 62(c) motion, movant must show a likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury without the stay and the absence of substantial harm to other persons specifically and the public…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Constructors Association Of Western Pennsylvania v. KrepsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Philadelphia Council of NeighBorhood Organizations v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Republic Industries, Inc. v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- BP Oil, Inc. v. MarshallDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McDonald v. CentraDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1990
- Republic Industries v. CENTRAL PA. TEAMSTERSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982