Paro v. Carter
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Although the testimony in this case was quite voluminous, the only issue was whether on the 19th day of March, 1918, the defendant negligently failed to use due care and skill by failing to remove gauze packages and bandages which he had used in the operation. There is no claim of any negligence in the former operation of December, 1913, or in subsequent treatment prior to March, 1918.
Under the pleadings and ruling of the court there is no issue before us as to negligence subsequent to March, 1918. It is conceded by both parties that there was no gauze in *126the abdominal wall prior to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Akridge v. NobleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Davis v. KerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Powell v. Ashland Iron & Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Slam v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Walker v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ault v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Grant v. Touro InfirmarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
- Mayer v. HipkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Tutton v. PattersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
- Shumway v. Milwaukee Athletic ClubWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.