Legal Opinion

Michigan Land & Iron Co. v. Township of L'Anse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Baraga. (Williams, J.) Assumpsit for tax paid under protest. Plaintiff brings-error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiff paid under protest a large-amount levied for highway tax for 1884 in the defendant township. No action had been taken by the electors, or by *702the township board, on the subject. The supervisor, on the faith of what was alleged to be the action of the highway ■commissioner, levied a money tax on plaintiff’s lands of half ■of one per cent. These lands were in what had been set apart as a road district; but it contained no inhabitants and no overseer, and there were no highways in it, and there have been pone since. The commissioner made no assessment, and all that appears in writing is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sawyer-Goodman Co. v. Township of Crystal FallsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Township of Midland v. Township of RoscommonMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Stevenson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hamilton & Merryman Co. v. Township of L'AnseMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ottawa Lumber, Co. v. Mayor of Harbor SpringsMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API