Legal Opinion
City of Hammond v. Reffitt
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 12, 2003No. 45A03-0205-CV-142PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Defendants, the City of Hammond and the City of Hammond Police (collectively "Hammond"), appeal from the trial court's denial of their motion for judgment on the evidence.
We reverse. 1
ISSUES
Hammond raises seven issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows: whether the trial court properly denied its motion for judgment on the evidence.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 22, 19983, Hammond Police Officers Llanes and Malacina were on duty in separate patrol cars. At about 4:45 p.m., they received a dispatch regarding a 911…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mullin v. Municipal City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by13 opinions
- Belcher v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Patrick v. MiressoIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- St. Joseph County Police Dept. v. ShumakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- East Chicago Police Department v. BynumIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hochstetler v. Elkhart County Highway DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.