Legal Opinion

Leavitte v. Drive-It-Yourself Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1925No. Appeal 326Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This foreign attachment in .assumpsit was issued to recover the price of certain sponges and chamois sold and delivered the defendant. The appeal is taken from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly s,aid that an appeal in such case is intended to reach only clear cases of error in law and prevent the delay incident to a trial: Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co., 225 Pa. 143; Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81 Pa. 378; Kidder Elevator Interlock Co. v. Muckle, 198 Pa. 388. In Holland v. Iron Works,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kidder Elevator Interlock Co. v. MuckleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Brown v. UngerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Holland v. Sunbury Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Snyder v. BaerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API