Legal Opinion
Moore Manufacturing & Foundry Co. v. Cronk Hanger Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
Decided October 15, 1895No. 6,325Published
This was a bill by the Moore Manufacturing & Foundry Company against the Cronk Hanger Company and others for alleged infringement of a patent.
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
The amended bill contains the written agreement under which the complainants assert title to the patents in suit. It provides as follows:
“The said Moore [the patentee] hereby licenses, empowers and authorises the-said company [the complainants] to make, use and sell for use throughout the United States, exclusive of all others, any and all of the devices secured by letters patent of the United States issued to said Moore, * * * the said license and authority to exist only for six years from and after the 1st day of August, 1893. * * * In case said company desires it, they…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Mitchell v. HawleySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Oliver v. Rumford Chemical WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Troy Iron & Nail Factory v. CorningSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.