Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1979No. 12475, 12477PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNN, Justice.

Defendants Richard Clark and Michael Hastings appeal from their convictions in the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit of maintaining a dwelling house where controlled drugs were used or stored and of possession of marijuana in violation of the Drugs and Substances Control Act embodied in SDCL 39-17.1 We affirm.

The basic facts involved in this case were stipulated to by the parties, and there is no transcript of testimony before the trial court. It appears that both defendants resided in and paid the rent on a house located at 3726 North Seventh Avenue in Sioux Falls,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WellnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. WeikerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. HabbenaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. United States v. GiresiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  5. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API