Legal Opinion

O. Robert Freesen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 8, 1986No. 85-2992PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The Internal Revenue Code allows a tax credit for investment in certain depreciable property. See 26 U.S.C. § 38. The Code also allows deductions for depreciation in excess of the “straight line” amount. See 26 U.S.C. § 168. But a lessor that serves merely as a financier or as a putative purchaser of tax advantage may not take an investment tax credit for the leased property, 26 U.S.C. § 46, and must treat as an item of tax preference the excess depreciation on that property, 26 U.S.C. § 57, which increases the alternative minimum tax.

Freesen Equipment Co. (Equipment Co.) purchased some…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Trudy WALTON, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED CONSUMERS CLUB, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Comdisco, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Illinois Cereal Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Snyder Howell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Concord Consumers Hous. Coop. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  2. Friendship Dairies, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Donald G. McNamara and Valerie J. McNamara and Robert F. Christiansen and Lucille L. Christiansen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Laglia v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
  5. Newman v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API