Legal Opinion

United States v. Vincent Randolph Thornton

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 27, 1978No. 78-5188PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

There is no merit to Thornton’s claim that a pistol found in his possession was improperly admitted into evidence because it was the fruit of an arrest made without probable cause.

Police received a citizen’s report that a black male wearing a brown leather jacket was loitering around a parking lot looking into cars parked on the lot. A police officer went to the area to investigate. Two blocks from the parking lot he saw Thornton, a black male, carrying a brown leather jacket under his arm. The officer stopped Thornton, asked for identification, and questioned him as to his destination.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. United States v. Gerald Wayne PrinceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Ricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. M.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. Jose Luis Pizarro and Miguel RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Vincent Randolph ThorntonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API