Larum v. Wilmer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Olay ton District Gowrt. Action for the recovery of real property — being certain fractions or strips of land lying near the line between the N. E. and the N. W. ■£ of § 3, Tp. 93, R. 5 W. The defendant-denied the allegations of the plaintiff’s petition, and also pleaded the statute of limitations. There was a judgment for plaintiff. The defendant appeals. The facts of the case will be found in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
„ _ adjudicata. This is an ordinary action to recover certain strips of land lying near a disputed line. The defendant alleges ownership in himself, and also pleads and relies upon the statute of limitations. On the trial, the plaintiff offered in evidence the entire records and proceedings in a case in the same court, and which was 'also decided on appeal, in this court, entitled Larum et al. v. Becker et al., and reported in the 28th Iowa, 590. The, first question now made arises upon the ruling of the court admitting this evidence. The facts respecting the record and proceedings offered…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hoy v. HeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- School Township v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Weiser v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Hintrager v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Knudson v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.