Legal Opinion

State v. Ferguson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 1978No. 77-973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Acting Chief Judge.

The state here appeals the dismissal of the information charging appellee Ferguson with permitting another person to engage in a game of cards on his premises, an offense prohibited by Section 849.01, Florida Statutes (1975) (keeping gambling houses, etc.). The trial court concluded that an essential element of the offense was the habitual use of the premises for gambling, and that because such habitual use was not alleged in the information, dismissal of the information was required. We hold that habitual use of the concerned premises for gambling is not an element of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schultz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. McNeill v. McNeillSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Gaetano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Vanderhorst, Alias Moon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  5. Bellamy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API