Legal Opinion

Milliren v. Sandy Township

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1905No. Appeal, No. 190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 190, Oct. T., 1905, by’ defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clearfield Go., Sept. T., •1904, No. 402, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Hannah Milliren and J. J. Milliren v. Township of Sandy. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries.- Before Smith, P. J. The circumstances of the accident are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $827.50. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were various instructions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

Hannah Milliren and J. J. Milliren, her husband, brought an action in trespass against Sandy township, to recover damages for an accident that happened to Hannah on June 23, 1904, while traveling from Du Bois to visit her mother at Rathmel, on one of the public roads of the township. While walking along this road, she was overtaken by a young man named Keagle, driving in a light wagon, with a load of feed, and he invited her to ride with him. He sat on a high spring seat near the front of the wagon and Mrs. Milliren took a seat beside him. They soon came to a piece of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. IrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Polenske v. Lit Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Musselman v. Hatfield BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Potter v. Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Walton v. Colwyn BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. MilliganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Clark v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API