Legal Opinion

Eames v. Cushman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 19, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The question in this case arises upon a ruling that, upon an auditor’s report, as evidence under the pleadings, the court was not warranted in law in finding for the plaintiff on the sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth counts of her declaration. These counts were for overdue interest, and the facts disclosed by the report were as follows.

The defendant gave the plaintiff promissory notes in renewal of earlier notes, upon which the interest was overdue. The new notes did not include, and were not received in satisfaction of, the overdue interest; but the question of interest was understood by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fake v. Addy'sCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  2. Simmons v. Lawrence Duck Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Marks v. Trustees of Purdue UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Robbins v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Robbins Cordage Co. v. BrewerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1861

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. MatheyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Dow v. PooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Agawam National Bank v. DowningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Gila Valley, Globe, & Northern Railroad v. LyonArizona Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API