Legal Opinion

People v. Gresham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 3, 1982No. 17204PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

We deal here with bootstrapping offenses into more serious convictions and the double enhancement of sentence.

The result is a mixed bag.

We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

Gresham was convicted by a jury of armed violence, aggravated battery, and two counts of unlawful use of weapons. He received concurrent sentences of 18 years’ imprisonment for armed violence and 8 years on one of the unlawful use of weapons counts.

On appeal, defendant argues: (1) that the crime of armed violence may not be predicated upon the felony offense of aggravated battery with the use of a deadly weapon;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. The People v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. PickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People of Illinois v. HaronIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Presnell v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. KrankelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. People v. HansonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. People v. GovanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. People v. HurleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API