Legal Opinion
WOODHAM v. MORGAN STANLEY
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 31, 2023No. 1:23-cv-02080Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY STACEY WOODHAM, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:23-cv-02080 MORGAN STANLEY (PARENT COMPANY) and E*TRADE FINANCIAL (SUBSIDIARY) REFERRED TO AS OPINION E*TRADE FROM MORGAN STANLEY, Defendants. APPEARANCES: Stacey Woodham 29 Club House Drive Willingboro, NJ 07046 Pro Se. Eric D. Wong GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 500 Campus Drive, Suite 400 Florham Park, New Jersey 07932 On behalf of Defendants. O’HEARN, District Judge INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’, E*TRADE Securities LLC1 (“E*TRADE”) and Morgan Stanley (DE)2 (“Morgan Stanley”)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Karen Malleus v. John GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.