Legal Opinion

Keith v. Henkleman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 9, 1897Published

Bill, for an injunction. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellants, Elbridge G. Keith and William A. Stanton, were sureties for the appellant John L. Peterson on an injunction bond in the suit of the latter against the Bra-brook Tailoring Company and others. Such bond was, by inadvertence and mistake, not sealed, and such mistake was not discovered until at or about the time the injunction was dissolved, in conformity with the opinion of this court in Henkleman v. Peterson, 40 Ill. App. 540. Thereupon the obligees in said bond (the appellees here) filed a bill to reform the bond,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ward v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Mercantile Insurance Co. v. JaynesIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Flaherty v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Henkleman v. PetersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API