Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Perry

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1994No. 7 Capital Appeal DocketPublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

In this appeal from a death sentence, appellant claims that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective. Appellant is correct, and a new trial is necessary due to inexcusably derelict representation by defense counsel.

In the early morning hours of August 7, 1987, appellant, Curry Perry, took his neighbor, Michael Shuler, to a private masonic club in Philadelphia as his guest. The two drank together, then argued over Perry’s assertion that Shuler had broken into his apartment, then fought, and Perry stabbed Shuler twice in the chest, fatally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. MabieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. FearsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API