Legal Opinion

Richard R. Woody Pinesbrook Motors, Incorporated v. General Motors Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1993No. 93-1331PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:

The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia granted appellee General Motors Corporation’s motion for summary judgment on appellant Richard R. Woody’s claims of breach of contract, violation of express and implied covenants of good faith dealing, tortious interference with contract, negligence, fraud, and conspiracy, arising out of General Motors’ refusal to approve two proposals by Woody to sell his Buick dealership. We affirm the district court’s disposition of Woody’s tort and express bad faith dealing claims. We disagree, however, that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Fidelity and Casualty Company, Inc. v. The London and Edinburgh Insurance Company, Limited, and the Dominion Insurance Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  2. Hubbard Chevrolet Company, Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. Bear Brand Hosiery Company v. Tights, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Al Carney and Al Carney Chevrolet-Buick, Incorporated v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Association of Surgical Assistants v. National Board of Surgical TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  3. Enfield Equipment Co., Inc. v. John Deere Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  4. (PS) Weinapple v. BontaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (SS) Trogdon v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API