Saturnino-Boudet v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Judge.
Appellant, Jose Satumino-Boudet, appeals his conviction and sentence for drug trafficking charges. Boudet was convicted after he pled nolo contendere to the charges, but he specifically reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress. We affirm the denial of this motion for the reasons which follow.
The salient facts are basically undisputed. In March 1989, the narcotics section of the Metro-Dade Police Department conducted a drug investigation at the South Dade home *190of one William Daniels a/k/a “Pistol Pete”. This investigation began when a package of narcotics…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Saturnino-Boudet v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996