Legal Opinion

Howard v. Handler Bros. & Winell, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGold, J.

The complaint in this case sets forth two causes of action based on the same events, the first founded on a breach of contract by the defendant and the second on defendant’s negligence. The first cause of action was dismissed by the court and the second submitted to the jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $3,477. The defendant has moved, pursuant to section 457-a of the Civil Practice Act, for a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $10.

The cause of action which was submitted to the jury alleged that on or about May 12, 1949, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Magnin v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Magnin v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Blossom v. . DoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Magnin v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. D'Utassy v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lipschutz v. Gordon Jewelry CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
  2. Abend v. HabermanNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API