Legal Opinion

Cox v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 2, 1909No. 249Published

Appeal from District Court, Rogers County; Archibald Bonds, Judge. C. B. Cox and others were convicted'of an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and they appeal. On motion for rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

FURMAN, Presiding Judge.

1. In the motion for a new-trial the sufficiency of the information is challenged. The information is as follows:

“In the District Court within and for Rogers County,- State of Oklahoma, Second Judicial District. Before Hon.

T. L. Brown, Judge.

“State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff, v. Tom Smith and B. C. Cox and John Thurman, Defendants. Information.
“Be it remembered that Wm. M. Hall, county attorney in and for Rogers county, state of Oklahoma, who prosecutes in the name and by the authority of the state of Oklahoma, comes.herein in person into the county court of said county…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Salter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Ex Parte FlowersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API