Legal Opinion

Richard W. Kochansky v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 13, 1996No. 94-70747PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

As part of a divorce settlement, Richard Kochansky (“Kochansky”) and his wife, Carol, agreed that a portion of the contingent fee which Kochansky earned by representing a client in a medical malpractice suit would be paid to Carol. After the divorce, the malpractice case was settled favorably and the fee paid. Kochansky appeals the Tax Court’s decision that the entire amount of the contingent fee is taxable to Kochansky de spite the fact that a portion of the contingent fee was distributed to Carol. In addition, Kochansky appeals the Tax Court’s judgment upholding the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Helvering v. EubankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. August C. Wolf Muriel M. Wolf v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Ted H. KimballCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Ted H. KimballCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Gwendolyn A. Ewing, Gwendolyn A. Ewing v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Charlotte's Office Boutique, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  3. Sparkman v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Kenseth v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  5. Franklin P. Coady Nona Coady v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API