Legal Opinion
Peguero v. Halo's Restaurant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardona, EJ. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 11, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant violated Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a and disqualified him from receiving wage replacement benefits.
Claimant sustained three separate compensable back injuries while working at varying times for different employers. In November 1999, at a time when claimant was receiving compensation benefits pursuant to the assertion that he was totally disabled and unable to engage in even light duty work, the extent of his disability was called into question as a result…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Losurdo v. Asbestos Free, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Claim of McCormack v. Eastport Manor ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by8 opinions
- Claim of Hammes v. Sunrise Psychiatric Clinic, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Robbins v. JerusalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Gillan v. New York State Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Claim of Clarke v. Lomasney Combustion, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Losurdo v. Asbestos Free, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.