Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 30, 1982No. 158-82CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

This veterans benefits case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 38(b) of this court on the ground this court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of plaintiffs’ claim. After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions and without oral argument, we deny the defendant’s motion.

Plaintiff John F. O’Connell is a totally disabled veteran who has been assigned such a rating by the Veterans Administration (VA) at all times relevant to this lawsuit. Plaintiffs allege that Mr. O’Connell’s VA disability payments were not subject to deduction by reason of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Armstrong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Minimo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. PowersUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API