Legal Opinion

Turner v. State

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1959PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Isidor Wasservogel,

Spec. Ref. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment determining that an amendment (L. 1958, ch. 893) to the Employment Agency Act (General Business Law, art. 11), insofar as it reduces fees which may he charged by nurses’ registries for private duty placement of nurses (General Business Law, § 185, subd. 9, par. [1]), is unconstitutional and void. A second cause of action in plaintiffs’ complaint seeks to enjoin the enforcement of said amendment.

Despite the lengthy pleadings and the numerous defendants (21) whom plaintiffs deemed necessary to join as parties to this action,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Petstel, Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Wells v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bryant Westchester Realty Corp. v. Board of HealthNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  5. College Barn, Inc. v. StateNew York Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API