People v. Wrobel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1500Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05), defendant contends that the plea was not knowingly or voluntarily entered because, contrary to the alleged promise of County Court, he was not enrolled in the Comprehensive Alcohol and Substance Abuse Treatment (CASAT) program following his plea of guilty. We reject that contention. Although the record establishes that defendant was statutorily eligible for the CASAT program (see Correction Law § 2 [18]; cf. Matter of Blake v Department of Corrections, 54 AD3d 1079…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Blake v. Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. MilsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009