Legal Opinion

Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

R. M. Taylor, the appellee, brought suit for damages against appellant, the Ft. Worth Denver City Railway Company, for injuries received by his wife while a passenger on one of appellant's trains. The ground of negligence alleged is that the station was not announced or opening sufficiently convenient made for the exit of passengers, the train being a vestibule one and no announcement made of the means for exit, and the train was not stopped long enough to allow Mrs. Taylor to alight therefrom in safety. The issues and facts of this case will be found more at length in the report of this case…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WashingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PowersTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Coastal Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Davis v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Coastal Transport Co. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Texas, New Mexico & Oklahoma Coaches, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Fisher v. Coastal Transport Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API