Pierce v. Boalick
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 104, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Centre Co., Aug. T., 1903, making absolute rule for debtor’s exemption in case of Rosa L. Pierce v. Theodora Boalick. Rule for debtor’s exemption out of real estate.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 104, Oct. T., 1909, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Centre Co., Aug. T., 1903, making absolute rule for debtor’s exemption in case of Rosa L. Pierce v. Theodora Boalick. Rule for debtor’s exemption out of real estate. From the record it appeared that on April 23, 1896, the widow and the heirs at law of William Simler, father of the defendant, Theodora Boalick, joined in a conveyance of the land under levy to J. Thomas Boalick, husband of the defendant in trust for the sole and separate use of Theodora Boalick for life, and after her death in trust for the heirs of her body. The…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Henderson, J.,
The defendant’s claim for exemption was recognized by the sheriff and competent persons were summoned to make the appraisement required by the Act of April 9, 1849, P. L. 533. *220The property levied on was real estate, and the appraisers determined against a division of it. Thereupon after the sale the defendant obtained a rule on the sheriff to pay to her the amount of the exemption allowed by the statute. The plaintiff filed an answer contesting her right to exemption on the ground that she had denied that she had any right, title or interest in the property levied on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williamson v. KrumbhaarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maschke, Receiver v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Front & Huntingdon Building & Loan Ass'n v. BerzinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Lancaster Bone Fertilizer Co. v. Weaver, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1932